Medical Interventions I’ll Never Accept & And What I’ll Do Instead
Before you read this, you need to understand something:
These are my opinions.
They're based on years of research, countless conversations with functional medicine providers, naturopathic doctors, traditional doctors, biological dentists, peptide specialists, and people who've been harmed by the system. They're based on my lived experience—the health crises that forced me to question everything I'd been told.
This is what I'm doing when I'm up at 3am.
This is the research I'm obsessed with. It's the podcasts I listen to almost daily. It's what I'm critically thinking about on my walks. I've dedicated my life to understanding how the body actually works, how it heals, and why conventional medicine so often fails.
I don't judge you if you've made different choices.
I don't judge you if you've done every single thing on my "won't do" list and think I'm wrong.
Because here's what I've learned: You have to be ready to comprehend these things.
I needed to go through two decades of eating shit before I understood the importance of eating healthy.
I needed a health scare—rock-hard, swollen lymph nodes that doctors wanted to biopsy—before I eliminated toxins, learned about peptides, and started IV therapy.
I needed to speak with a doctor who treats vaccine-injured children before I understood why I should be selective with vaccines.
I needed to completely ruin my stomach lining and develop SIBO before I realized the importance of gut health.
I needed to get dizzy every single time I stood up before I understood the importance of metabolic health and hydration.
I needed to witness several people go from seemingly healthy before a cancer diagnosis to completely sick and withered after treatment before I realized something wasn't right with cancer diagnosis and treatment.
I needed to experience birth control myself—the complete hormonal chaos—before I understood how horrible it can be. And for what?
Each wake-up call brought me closer to the truth:
The system isn't designed to make you healthy. It's designed to manage your symptoms indefinitely.
I'm not rejecting medicine.
I'm rejecting a system that profits from managing my illness instead of curing it.
The medical interventions I refuse all share common traits: they treat symptoms instead of root causes, they carry significant risks, they often cause more harm than good, and there are safer, more effective alternatives.
The interventions I accept work WITH my body's natural healing processes, address root causes, and empower me to take control of my health.
You don't have to accept every intervention your doctor recommends just because they have MD after their name.
You're allowed to ask questions. You're allowed to refuse. You're allowed to seek alternatives.
So if you're reading this and thinking I'm crazy, extreme, or irresponsible, you're probably not ready yet.
And that's okay.
But if you're reading this and something clicks, if you're nodding along, if you've had your own wake-up calls and you're looking for someone who gets it…
Keep reading.
Your body. Your health.
This is for you.
MAMMOGRAMS
Why I refuse:
Mammograms expose breast tissue to ionizing radiation annually—the same thing that causes cancer. Studies show up to 30% of breast cancers detected via mammogram are overdiagnosed (meaning they would never have harmed you, but now you're getting surgery, radiation, and chemo anyway).
False positive rates are high, leading to unnecessary biopsies, anxiety, and interventions. Compression of breast tissue during imaging may also rupture encapsulated tumors causing it to spread which creates a cascade of symptoms and interventions—essentially you just went from 0 to 100 because of a test.
What I'll do instead:
Multiple safer alternatives exist:
Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI) - Uses a radioactive tracer but much lower radiation dose than mammogram. Detects cancer in dense tissue.
Tear test (emerging technology) - Research shows that tear fluid contains biomarkers that can detect breast cancer. Non-invasive test analyzes tears for cancer-specific proteins. Still in research phases but promising as a screening tool with zero radiation, zero compression, zero harm.
Thermography - Detects inflammation patterns and vascular changes (early warning signs of cancer) without radiation or compression. Non-invasive, painless.
Ultrasound - Uses sound waves to create detailed images of breast tissue. No radiation. Excellent for detecting masses, especially in dense breast tissue.
Breast MRI - For high-risk individuals. No radiation, highly sensitive. Expensive and not routine, but an option if truly needed.
Blood tests - Liquid biopsies detecting circulating tumor DNA or cancer biomarkers in blood. Non-invasive early detection.
Clinical breast exams - By a trained provider who knows what they're looking for. Regular manual exams catch many cancers.
Self-exams - Monthly self-checks. You know your body better than anyone.
Most importantly: Address root causes of cancer - Metabolic health, eliminate toxins, reduce inflammation, optimize gut health, support detox pathways, fasting. Prevent cancer instead of screening for it with radiation.
BIOPSIES
Why I refuse:
Your body is smarter than you think. When it encounters cancer cells or toxins it can't eliminate, it does something brilliant: it walls them off. It says, "We're going to store all this bad stuff over here in the corner to try to protect the rest of me."
That's what a tumor is. A containment strategy.
Now imagine puncturing that with a needle.
It's like popping a water balloon. Except the water is cancer cells, and now they're spilling into surrounding tissue and your bloodstream.
This is why people often appear sicker AFTER getting a biopsy and starting cancer treatment. You just released what the body was desperately trying to contain.
Needle tract seeding is acknowledged even in mainstream oncology—they just call it "rare." But even a small risk of spreading localized cancer into systemic cancer is unacceptable to me when non-invasive alternatives exist. Another method that can cause you to go from 0 to 100—this is why you often hear “wow we caught it at the perfect time” No, not necessarily true. You just punctured a tumor causing toxins to spread, of course you’re going to have symptoms.
What I'll do instead:
Liquid biopsies (blood tests detecting circulating tumor DNA), imaging (thermography, ultrasound), and if I ever face cancer, I'm not poking it—I'm starving it.
Metabolic therapy (super strict ketogenic diet to deprive cancer cells of glucose), high-dose vitamin C IV (cytotoxic to cancer cells), potentially surgery to remove the entire mass (not biopsy it), potentially CAR-T cell therapy (using my own immune cells), hyperbaric oxygen therapy (cancer hates oxygen), red light therapy, ozone therapy, sauna therapy, fasting protocols.
Treat the cancer like an infection you starve and suffocate, not a genetic disease you poison yourself trying to kill.
PAP SMEARS
Why I refuse:
Beyond the high false positive rates and overtreatment (LEEP procedures that damage the cervix and increase preterm birth risk), here's what most women don't know:
The swabs used in Pap smears are often coated with chemicals—including known carcinogens:
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) - carcinogen, endocrine disruptor
Formaldehyde - known carcinogen (used in preservative solutions)
Triclosan - endocrine disruptor linked to cancer
Ethylene oxide (used in sterilization) - known human carcinogen
You're being screened for cervical cancer with a tool coated in cancer-causing chemicals.
Add that to the fact that 90% of HPV infections (the virus linked to cervical cancer) clear naturally within two years with proper immune function, and the entire screening protocol becomes questionable.
What I'll do instead:
Optimize immune function (gut health, vitamin D, reduce toxic load, manage stress), annual pelvic exams with a trusted provider, and if there's legitimate concern, I'll use less invasive imaging or alternative screening methods first.
COLONOSCOPY
Why I refuse:
Colonoscopies carry real risks:
Bowel perforation (1 in 1,000—rare but catastrophic, requiring emergency surgery)
Bleeding
Infection
Adverse reactions to anesthesia
The prep alone destroys your gut microbiome
And here's what they don't tell you: Not all polyps are dangerous.
Most polyps are benign and will never turn into cancer. Some types (hyperplastic polyps) have zero cancer risk. Even adenomatous polyps (precancerous) take 10-15 years to potentially turn into cancer.
Aggressively removing every polyp found creates unnecessary risk and doesn't meaningfully reduce cancer mortality for most people.
Colon cancer develops slowly. You have time to prevent it through lifestyle, monitor it non-invasively, and intervene if necessary—without routine colonoscopies.
What I'll do instead:
Non-invasive screening options:
Cologuard - At-home stool DNA test that detects abnormal cells and blood. 92% accurate for detecting colon cancer. No prep, no anesthesia, no perforation risk.
FIT test (Fecal Immunochemical Test) - Detects hidden blood in stool. Annual test, done at home.
Stool DNA tests - Detect genetic mutations associated with cancer.
Blood tests - Emerging options like Guardant Shield (blood-based screening for colon cancer). Non-invasive, detects circulating tumor DNA.
CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy) - Uses CT scan to create 3D images of colon. Minimal prep, no sedation, no scope. Still involves radiation but far less invasive than traditional colonoscopy.
Flexible Sigmoidoscopy - Examines only the lower colon (where most cancers develop). Less invasive, minimal prep, no full sedation required.
Comprehensive stool analysis - Assesses gut health, inflammation, microbiome balance, digestive function. Identifies issues before they become cancer.
Prevention through lifestyle:
High-fiber diet (from vegetables, not grains)
Eliminate seed oils and processed food
Anti-inflammatory diet
Regular movement
Stress management
Optimize vitamin D (low vitamin D strongly linked to colon cancer)
Avoid processed meats
Support gut microbiome
Monitor symptoms that actually warrant investigation:
Unexplained weight loss
Blood in stool
Persistent changes in bowel habits (lasting weeks)
Severe abdominal pain
Bottom line: I'm not subjecting myself to anesthesia, bowel perforation risk, and microbiome destruction for a screening test that often finds benign polyps and creates unnecessary interventions.
I'll use non-invasive screening, prevent colon cancer through lifestyle, and only pursue invasive testing if there's legitimate clinical concern—not as routine surveillance.
ROOT CANALS
Why I refuse:
A root canal leaves a dead tooth in your mouth. Dead tissue harbors bacteria—this is undisputed biology.
Even with perfect sterilization, you cannot eliminate bacteria from the microscopic tubules inside the tooth. DNA analysis of root-canaled teeth shows persistent bacterial colonization.
Here's what convinced me:
There's a documented case of a woman who had a root canal and developed a chronic infection in her face under her eye. She suffered for years with a multitude of symptoms—chronic pain, inflammation, fatigue, mysterious health issues that wouldn't resolve.
Doctors ran every test. No one could figure it out.
Until someone finally connected it to her root canal.
The tooth was removed. The chronic infection resolved. Her symptoms disappeared nearly immediately.
That dead tooth had been the source of systemic inflammation the entire time.
This isn't rare. Biological dentists see this constantly—root canals causing chronic low-grade infections linked to heart disease, autoimmune conditions, and unexplained chronic illness.
I will not keep a dead, bacteria-harboring tooth in my body.
What I'll do instead:
Extract the tooth and replace it with a ceramic (zirconia) implant—NOT heavy metal implants.
Address the root cause of why the tooth died (nutrition, infection, toxic load).
CHEMO AND RADIATION
Why I refuse:
Cancer is not primarily genetic. It's environmental and metabolic.
Yes, there are genetic mutations involved—but those mutations are triggered by toxins, chronic inflammation, metabolic dysfunction, and mitochondrial damage.
Families develop the same cancers because they carry similar genetic variants AND they eat the same food, live in the same toxic environment, and have the same lifestyle patterns. The genes create susceptibility. The environment activates them. You can carry a cancer gene your entire life and never get cancer—if you don't turn it on.
Here's something most people don't know: The CIA released documents exploring the connection between cancer and parasites.
Cancer cells and parasitic worms have shocking similarities:
Both hoard sugar (glycogen) and stockpile it
Both process energy in a similar way: half-anaerobic (no oxygen needed), half-aerobic
Drugs that kill parasites also kill cancer (Myracyl D worked against both parasitic worms and tumors)
Another drug (Guanozolo) blocks nucleic acid production and works on both infusoria (tiny organisms) and mouse cancer tumors
Cancer cells and gut parasites react identically to certain drugs—they share a biochemical "fingerprint"
Bottom line: Scientists in 1950 were already building the case that cancer and parasites are biochemically so similar that drugs targeting one might work on the other—basically treating cancer like an infection.
Add that to the metabolic theory (Otto Warburg won a Nobel Prize showing cancer ferments glucose), and it becomes clear:
Cancer is not a genetic disease you poison with chemo. It's a metabolic dysfunction you fix with diet, detox, oxygenation, and immune support.
Chemotherapy and radiation destroy your immune system—the very system you need to fight cancer. They kill healthy cells along with cancer cells, create chemo-resistant cancer stem cells, and cause secondary cancers.
Oncology profits from managing your cancer, not curing it.
What I'll do instead:
Metabolic therapy (strict ketogenic or carnivore diet to starve cancer cells), fasting protocols, high-dose vitamin C IV, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, ozone therapy, mistletoe therapy, turkey tail mushrooms, immune optimization, detox protocols, red light therapy, sauna therapy, and if necessary, CAR-T cell therapy or surgical removal of the tumor (without biopsy).
I'll treat cancer as a metabolic/environmental disease, not a death sentence requiring poison.
SSRIs (ANTIDEPRESSANTS)
Why I refuse:
The "chemical imbalance" theory of depression was marketing, not science. Even the researchers who created SSRIs have admitted serotonin deficiency doesn't cause depression.
SSRIs come with brutal side effects: emotional blunting, sexual dysfunction, weight gain, and withdrawal symptoms so severe people describe them as "brain zaps" when trying to quit.
They don't fix the root cause (trauma, inflammation, gut dysfunction, nutrient deficiencies, chronic stress). They numb you.
What I'll do instead:
Address root causes—gut health (90% of serotonin is made in the gut), inflammation, nutrient deficiencies (B vitamins, magnesium, omega-3s, vitamin D), thyroid function, trauma therapy, and peptides like Semax or Selank if needed for neuroplasticity support.
STATINS
Why I refuse:
Cholesterol is not the enemy. Inflammation is.
Statins lower cholesterol by blocking your body's natural production of CoQ10 (critical for heart and muscle function). Side effects include muscle pain, cognitive decline, liver damage, and increased diabetes risk.
Your brain is 25% cholesterol. Your hormones are made from cholesterol. Lowering it indiscriminately destroys your body.
What I'll do instead:
Address inflammation through diet (eliminate seed oils, sugar, processed food), optimize omega-3 intake, reduce oxidative stress, support mitochondrial health, and monitor inflammatory markers (CRP, homocysteine) instead of obsessing over LDL numbers.
BENADRYL
Why I refuse:
Benadryl (diphenhydramine) is an anticholinergic drug. Long-term use is linked to dementia and cognitive decline. It blocks acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter critical for memory and learning.
Studies show regular use increases dementia risk by up to 50%.
What I'll do instead:
For allergies—address root cause (gut health, histamine intolerance, mast cell activation). Use quercetin, vitamin C, DAO enzyme, or natural antihistamines.
FLUORIDE
Why I refuse:
Fluoride is a neurotoxin that accumulates in the pineal gland (your body's melatonin-producing, circadian-regulating gland). Harvard studies link fluoride exposure to lower IQ in children.
It was added to water supplies not for your teeth, but as a way to dispose of industrial waste from aluminum and phosphate manufacturing.
Europe banned it. The US still adds it to tap water.
What I'll do instead:
Filter my water (reverse osmosis removes fluoride), use fluoride-free toothpaste, and optimize oral health through diet, proper brushing, and hydroxyapatite or xylitol toothpaste.
BIRTH CONTROL PILLS
Why I refuse:
Synthetic hormones shut down your natural cycle, deplete critical nutrients (B vitamins, magnesium, zinc), destroy gut microbiome, and increase risk of blood clots, depression, and autoimmune disease.
30 years later, women are dealing with PCOS, infertility, and hormonal chaos because nobody warned them that shutting down your endocrine system for a decade has consequences.
What I'll do instead:
Fertility awareness method (tracking basal body temperature and cervical mucus), or addressing root causes of painful/irregular cycles (gut health, insulin resistance, inflammation, stress).
VACCINES
Why I refuse (or heavily delay/selectively accept):
I'm not anti-vaccine. I'm anti-liability shields, anti-regulatory capture, and anti-untested vaccine schedules.
What changed my mind:
In 1986, vaccine manufacturers were granted complete legal immunity. You cannot sue them if their product harms your child. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid out over $5 billion—funded by taxpayers, not manufacturers.
If vaccines are so safe, why do they need legal immunity?
The childhood vaccine schedule has tripled since 1986—26+ doses by 12 months of age. That schedule has never been tested as a whole. There are no double-blind, placebo-controlled trials using inert placebos to establish long-term safety. The "placebos" used in vaccine trials contain aluminum or other vaccines—not saline.
There are no studies comparing completely unvaccinated children to fully vaccinated children. This is the study that would actually answer the safety question. It doesn't exist. When asked why, experts claim it would be "unethical"—which presupposes the very safety the study is meant to test.
The ingredients raise red flags:
Aluminum salts (neurotoxins linked to autoimmune conditions), formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, residual viral DNA fragments, and thimerosal (mercury) until public pressure forced a reduction. These are injected directly into the body, bypassing natural barriers. The long-term cumulative impact has never been studied.
The statistics are damning:
Nations requiring more infant vaccine doses have higher infant mortality rates. The US requires 26 doses before age one and ranks 46th globally in infant mortality. Infants receiving more vaccines simultaneously have higher rates of hospitalization and death according to VAERS data analysis.
Risk vs. benefit doesn't always add up:
Measles death rates had already fallen to 1 in 250,000 before the vaccine was introduced (due to improved nutrition and medical care). The MMR vaccine lists seizures in 1 in 3,000 children. Sometimes the vaccine side effects are more common than the worst outcomes from the illness.
I've spoken with doctors treating vaccine-injured children—seizures, neurological damage, autoimmune conditions. Real families, real consequences.
"But disease rates dropped because of vaccines!"
Did they?
Let's look at the actual timeline:
Measles, polio, whooping cough, scarlet fever, typhoid, diphtheria—mortality rates for all these diseases dropped 90-95% BEFORE vaccines were introduced.
Why?
Clean water and sanitation - Eliminated water-borne diseases
Refrigeration - Prevented food-borne illness
Improved nutrition - Stronger immune systems
Antibiotics - Treated secondary bacterial infections (the actual killers in many viral diseases)
Better medical care - Supportive care that kept people alive through illness
Indoor plumbing - Reduced transmission
Pasteurization - Eliminated milk-borne diseases
If you look at mortality data (not case rates), deaths were already plummeting before vaccine introduction. The vaccine gets credit for a decline that was already happening.
Example: Measles
In 1900, measles killed 13.3 per 100,000 people in the US.
By 1955 (before the vaccine), it killed 0.03 per 100,000.
That's a 99.7% decline before the vaccine existed.
The vaccine was introduced in 1963 when measles was already barely fatal due to improved nutrition, antibiotics for secondary infections, and medical care.
"But what about case rates?"
Yes, case rates dropped after vaccines. But cases and deaths are not the same thing.
Getting measles with modern nutrition and medical care is not the same as getting measles in 1900 with no antibiotics, poor sanitation, and malnutrition.
And here's what they won't tell you:
Vaccine-induced immunity wanes. That's why boosters are required. Outbreaks still happen in highly vaccinated populations—because the immunity isn't lifelong like natural immunity.
Fully vaccinated individuals can still carry and transmit diseases like pertussis without showing symptoms, which undermines the "herd immunity" argument.
So when someone says "rates dropped because of vaccines"—ask them:
Are you talking about case rates or death rates?
What was the mortality rate BEFORE the vaccine was introduced?
What other factors changed during that time period (sanitation, nutrition, antibiotics, medical care)?
Why do outbreaks still occur in 95%+ vaccinated populations if vaccines create herd immunity?
Correlation is not causation.
Vaccines got credit for a public health improvement that was already well underway due to sanitation, nutrition, and modern medicine.
What I'll do instead:
Optimize immune function (nutrition, gut health, vitamin D, sleep, stress management). Delay vaccines until immune system maturity. Selectively accept only vaccines for truly life-threatening diseases after careful individual risk/benefit analysis—not blindly follow an untested schedule created by a regulatory agency funded 75% by pharmaceutical companies.
MRI / CT SCANS (UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY)
Why I avoid unless critical:
CT scans expose you to significant radiation (one CT = 100-400 chest X-rays worth of radiation). Repeated exposure increases cancer risk.
MRIs with contrast dye inject gadolinium (a heavy metal) into your body. It's supposed to clear within hours, but many people develop gadolinium toxicity—it accumulates in brain, bones, and organs.
When I'll do it:
Life-threatening situations (severe trauma, suspected stroke, brain bleed, acute injury requiring immediate surgical intervention). Otherwise, I'll use ultrasound or wait and monitor.
INTERVENTIONS I WILL ACCEPT
PEPTIDES
Peptides are signaling molecules that tell your body to heal, regenerate, and optimize. BPC-157 for gut healing and injury recovery. TB-500 for tissue repair. Semax for cognitive enhancement. KPV for inflammation.
They work with your body's natural processes, not against them.
CAR-T CELL THERAPY (FOR CANCER)
This uses your own immune cells, genetically modified to target cancer cells. It's expensive and not perfect, but it works WITH your immune system instead of destroying it like chemo.
If I ever faced cancer, this would be on the table alongside metabolic therapy.
HIGH-DOSE VITAMIN C IV
At high doses (25-100 grams), vitamin C becomes cytotoxic to cancer cells while leaving healthy cells untouched. It also supports immune function, collagen production, and detoxification.
Used in integrative cancer protocols worldwide. Ignored by conventional oncology because there's no profit in it.
TARGETED SUPPLEMENTS
Not multivitamins. Targeted, high-quality supplementation based on labs and symptoms. Magnesium glycinate for sleep and muscle function. Vitamin D3+K2 for immune and bone health. Omega-3s for inflammation. NAC for glutathione production.
Supplements are tools, not replacements for real food.
IV THERAPY
High-dose vitamin C, glutathione, NAD+, Myers' cocktails—nutrients delivered directly into the bloodstream bypass digestion and provide immediate cellular support.
Especially useful for immune support, detox, recovery from illness, or addressing severe deficiencies.
QUARTERLY LAB WORK
You can't fix what you don't measure. I track:
Comprehensive metabolic panel
Thyroid (full panel, not just TSH)
Hormones (estrogen, progesterone, testosterone, cortisol)
Inflammatory markers (CRP, homocysteine)
Nutrient levels (vitamin D, B12, magnesium, iron)
Fasting insulin and glucose
I want data, not guesses.
NATUROPATHIC MEDICINE
Naturopathic doctors are trained to address root causes, not just prescribe pharmaceuticals. They use herbs, nutrition, lifestyle interventions, and when necessary, bioidentical hormones or targeted therapies.
They spend time with you. They listen. They treat you like a whole person, not a symptom checklist.
ASPIRIN (ONLY FOR SEVERE HEADACHES)
Aspirin is one of the few pharmaceutical drugs I'll use—and only when absolutely necessary. It reduces inflammation and thins blood.
But I'm addressing why I got the headache in the first place (dehydration, magnesium deficiency, blood sugar crash, stress, histamine reaction).
DENTAL X-RAYS
Dental X-rays use minimal radiation and help catch problems early—cavities, bone loss, impacted teeth, abscesses.
Here's why I accept them:
Your mouth is the gateway to your entire body. Infections in your teeth and gums don't stay localized. They spread systemically, causing:
Heart disease (oral bacteria enter bloodstream and colonize heart valves)
Chronic inflammation throughout the body
Autoimmune flares
Increased risk of stroke
Metabolic dysfunction
Brain inflammation (oral bacteria found in Alzheimer's patients' brains)
Catching a cavity or abscess early prevents systemic infection that could wreak havoc on your entire body.
The radiation exposure from dental X-rays is minimal compared to the damage caused by undetected oral infections.
I'll do them as needed—not the excessive every-6-months routine some dentists push, but when clinically indicated.
I’ll work with a biological dentist who uses the lowest radiation possible and only takes X-rays when necessary.
ULTRASOUND
Non-invasive, no radiation, real-time imaging. Excellent for monitoring organs, blood flow, pregnancy, soft tissue injuries.
This is my go-to imaging when possible.
STEM CELL THERAPY
Your own stem cells can regenerate damaged tissue—cartilage, tendons, ligaments, even organs. This is regenerative medicine, not disease management.
I'd use this for joint injuries, degenerative conditions, or tissue repair before ever considering joint replacement surgery.
LYMPHATIC DRAINAGE
Your lymphatic system has no pump—it relies on movement and manual manipulation. Lymphatic drainage (via massage or specialized therapy) supports detoxification, reduces inflammation, and boosts immune function.
Critical for anyone dealing with chronic illness, post-surgery recovery, or toxic overload.
SAUNA THERAPY
Infrared sauna promotes detoxification through sweat, improves circulation, reduces inflammation, and supports mitochondrial health.
I'll use this 3-5x/week for life.
RED LIGHT THERAPY
Red and near-infrared light penetrate deep into tissues, supporting mitochondrial function, collagen production, wound healing, and reducing inflammation.
It's like photosynthesis for humans.
OZONE THERAPY
Ozone therapy (IV or insufflation) oxygenates tissues, kills pathogens, and supports immune function. Cancer hates oxygen. So do most chronic infections.
Widely used in Europe. Barely known in the US.
FASTING
Intermittent fasting, extended fasting, water fasts—fasting gives your body a break from constant digestion, promotes autophagy (cellular cleanup), resets insulin sensitivity, and starves cancer cells (which can't survive without glucose).
It's free. It's powerful. And it works.
THE BOTTOM LINE
I'm not rejecting medicine.
I'm rejecting a system that profits from managing my illness instead of curing it.
The medical interventions I refuse all share common traits: they treat symptoms instead of root causes, they carry significant risks, they often cause more harm than good, and there are safer, more effective alternatives.
The interventions I accept work WITH my body's natural healing processes, address root causes, and empower me to take control of my health.
You don't have to accept every intervention your doctor recommends just because they have MD after their name.
You're allowed to ask questions. You're allowed to refuse. You're allowed to seek alternatives.
Your body. Your choice. Your health.
—Kaitlyn
Ancient Wisdom. Modern Optimization.
The Astarte Company
theastartecompany@gmail.com
Medical Disclaimer:
The Astarte Company and Kaitlyn Auger are not licensed medical providers and do not diagnose, treat, prescribe, or provide medical advice. All information provided is for educational purposes only. Always consult with a qualified, licensed healthcare professional before making changes to your health regimen.
